Big Bad Wah by Joe Satriani & Vox at the Namm Show 2009

advertisement


Heres another clip on the Vox Big Bad Wah at the 2009 Namm Show. www.citymusic.com.sg

Popularity: 1% [?]

About the Author

The Admin Guy

The Admin Guy

Kay Stanford Jr Kastum is a lad who hail from a place called Sabah. It's one of the 13 states in Malaysia. He's currently working in an outsource call center in Kuala Lumpur. His passion is always in music although he is still working on his guitar skills like...forever! Was married, he dreams to be financially free one day and devote his time to his music, family, friends and of course God.

25 Comments so far

  1. MusicalRevenge on January 19th, 2011

    @datnoidkid they fixed it mate, I checked to make sure, and it is by far the best wah I’ve ever played on, there is so much you can do with it, that it’s the most versatile wah ive ever bought, while maintaing crisp sound quality. I LOVE IT!!!

  2. Satch21Freak on January 19th, 2011

    the pedal is pretty good! but i also have to say it doesnt sound as great without the satchurator paired with it

  3. fobsternd on January 19th, 2011

    i dont hear the difference btwn the voice switch, and the inductor on/off toggling.

  4. joshlgrant on January 19th, 2011

    probably a good pedal, but crappy sound, so you really cant judge in this video..

  5. xxRockst4r on January 19th, 2011

    It’s a great wah. it’s all about how you set it up. If you buy it and expect you can just step on it and sound like joe satriani then just return the freakin’ pedal.

  6. AldridgeHalenFreak on January 20th, 2011

    I bought one of these. Mine is working real well. It sounds good. I bought a Clyde Fulltone Delux and I actually liked the Vox with my Rig better than that Clyde so I gave the Clyde back with no regrets. I never Broke a waw before. What actually Broke on yours guy?

  7. orpheus06 on January 20th, 2011

    Real Mccoy Custom Wheels of Fire Wah. piece of crap!!!

  8. ajatkinson2004 on January 20th, 2011

    WOF? Whats that?

  9. DonLeo7965 on January 20th, 2011

    I paid 200 euro a few moths ago but i did’nt use it alot because the guitar sounds different without using wah wile playing. In action it sounds good but now it’s ……………………………. broken. I hate to say this as a real Satriani fan but there must be better wahs out for that money.

  10. datnoidkid on January 20th, 2011

    this thing is a pile of sSHIT!i have taken mine back five times cause of the cheap ass potz they put in, dont buy this thing till vox takes care of the problem.

  11. varone6t9 on January 20th, 2011

    is the time machine a true bypass pedal and is it analog? someone please get back to me before i purchase this.

  12. manfromwillowdale on January 20th, 2011

    Bullshit – Korg owns VOX – Marshall is a different story. Korg USA distributes Marshall that all.

  13. YearraeY on January 20th, 2011

    love it, sounds …..instead of WAH, sounds like…..BLEAAAWWAAAA :D

  14. rocknrollman1234 on January 20th, 2011

    Korg owns both vox and marshall. That’s why I don’t buy vox or marshall stuff anymore.

  15. feedbackismyfriend on January 20th, 2011

    He did say Korg but I’m pretty sure they are related (IE: Vox owns Korg, Korg owns Vox, or another company owns both of them) so Korg probably put some work into these pedals even though they all have the vox name

  16. issofunky on January 20th, 2011

    LOL! THAT”S MAN IN THE BOX….it’s Alice IN Chains first big hit.

  17. fmradioguy101 on January 20th, 2011

    that riff/lick at 48 secs ish.. I recognise that from somewhere but I can’t for the life of me remember where, other then that it looks like a damn good pedal

  18. NeckPickup on January 20th, 2011

    At the end of this video he says “Since we are Korg we can do that” … Did i hear wrong? or did he forget who he was whoring for?

  19. highrollerzzz on January 20th, 2011

    that’s one deep rangy wah, I like :)

  20. californianmojo on January 20th, 2011

    man this wah has a zack whylde wah plus
    more

  21. orpheus06 on January 20th, 2011

    yea.. I wish my WOF sounded like the one in that clip!

  22. badmuddy on January 20th, 2011

    i even paid for mine; i got a whopping $20 discount, if memory serves. i didn’t even get any credit for my work. & after 3-4 month’s of huddling over a friend’s rmc3 & tweaking until my back hurt, i got referred to as some “client” who requested a custom wah. no one would even know of my involvement in it’s creation if i didn’t have to keeping jumping in & pointing that out; kinda hurts. now if i was joe walsh, i’d get credit for just looking at it. hell, i might even GET one as a thankyou.

  23. badmuddy on January 20th, 2011

    no, my clip is the one above that video. it’s really short & less bombastic. my intent was to illustrate how wide a sweep the wof has. i do have longer clips on my soundclick page, but this one i kept short & simple. the guy in the vid is playing a released version. mine doesn’t have the bass resonance pot nor dave fox’s “fuzz friendly” circuit. it’s a very rich sounding beast. i wish i could get a released version, especially considering that i’m the reason the wof exists in the 1st place…

  24. orpheus06 on January 20th, 2011

    The problem here isn’t that it’s not working for me. I bet it wouldn’t even work for you. I bet your WOF sound better than this one. Mine sounds like a cheap auto wah with a lot of High frequencies. I’m being honest I saw your video and that wah sound like a real wah pedal. not mine. I thinking on making a video just to prove this. Because its a over $200 pedal!

  25. badmuddy on January 20th, 2011

    if it didn’t work for you, that’s understandable. doesn’t make it krappe. i’ve never played the released version, so i couldn’t vouch for it. mine is the one made from my original settings on an rmc3. i even named it. i did the clip on his site with mine. it even knocked a pro analog supaquack off of my board, so it’s worked big time for me.

Leave a reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image